Monday, May 21, 2007

The Big Not Getting It

Two important e-reads have passed my desk in the last few days, and since I have a professional obligation to report on both of them, I'd like just one minute to vent. The first is "The Continuity of Discontinuity", a new study put out by Steven Cohen and Ari Kelman on "new Jewish initiatives", and the second is The Hadassah-Brandeis Institute's most recent e-zine, with the clever title "Is Judaism a Girl Thing?" (playing off Rosh Hodesh: It's a Girl Thing!).

"Continuity of Discontinuity" is a long read, but I thought it was important to slog through: generally I find my position best summed up as Professional Young Person. (It's a step up from the Professional Jew niche I occupied during college.) In summation, it seeks to assuage older Jews who might read it (although its graphics, to my eye, were pitched to a young audience) that young Jews haven't, in fact, dropped out of the J-world; we just use radically different to engage with one another and with our culture. (And, yes, culture is an appropriate word there, because most of the conversation stayed away from religion, although I see an easy correlation between what were identified as cultural markers--an inherent dislike of hierarchy, lateral community building, etc.--in many of the religious innovations I personally use.) Surprise, surprise, we find the exclusivity of our elders repugnant; we find heteronormative, nuclear-family-oriented, non-progressive programming stifling and we like the internet. Whoa!

I know I'm being facetious and not very patient here, but I'm not only tired of feeling like the monkey in the observation tank, but I can't believe it both took the community so long to care about this stuff and that this is heralded as such news. It's good, it's great, even, that this may make its way into the hands of those responsible for the "Young Jews Just Don't Care" propaganda and assuage some of their loudly-held doomsday proclamations. God knows it just confirms everything I could have told these researchers. I guess that's what bugs me--I can't believe it takes a team of sociologists to uncover this. Just ask us! When Hillel published its report on Millenials (which, by the way, said many of the same things--was no one listening?), my Hillel director just snorted and said, yeah, we kind of knew that already. Which may be why she remains a very good friend--when she wants to know what I'm thinking, she asks! When my bosses want to know about new technology, or how do I use blogs, or where can information be found, or do I think young Jews are disengaged from x and for what possible reasons--they ask! They group they surveyed is exceptionally bright, no doubt (I've had the chance to chat with Aaron Bisman at parties, and he really is awesome), but they could have picked any four of the hundreds and maybe thousands of articulate, hard-working folks out there. I'm not mad they didn't ask other people--I'm mad that nobody seems to consider that a course of action. We've not yet turned into a movement that swears off the establishment entirely (and, thanks to said internet, we probably won't ever cohere that way)--so take the opportunity to ask us us, Establishment.

As for Judaism being a "girl thing" (and despite the "clever" title, isn't that a sweetly patronising way of putting the question?), I can't emphasize enough how sick I am of even the little simmering undercurrents of this conversation that I seem to keep have over and over. I know I should be more empathetic, and I do strongly believe that it's time to start actively working to include men--and boys--in Jewish life more consciously. But the kvetching really has to stop, and I mean now. I find the whole "the Reform Movement isn't comfortable with male spaces, and so boys are dropping out, because the woman-smell is overpowering" to be the biggest load of bullshit. This is how the Men's Movement's gonna work? Because then we really need to address gender stereotypes of exactly who are the snivelling whiners of the bunch. If, after 5,000+ years of patriarchy and misogeny, women can force themselves into the scene and demand to be taken seriously while overhauling the system to find themselves inside it, surely men, after 30 or so years of menacing Debbie Friedman songs, can say, hey, we really need to do our own spiritual-finding work, because the Women's Movement has shown us that the tradition really can be at least a little flexible and still full of meaning, and we were a little embarrassed to say this, but it hasn't been working for us either. But the blame-the-woman thing--and believe me, that's what it is--is disgusting. I'm disgusted. What a cop-out on the part of a population that should be thanking J Fems for trailblazing. I support curricular change and inclusion work and I support men's individual and even group efforts to locate themselves within Jewish culture and religion, but the moment you say "women took over" is the moment you lose the whole of my respect, and you can take that shit to the bank.

The morals of our story? Talk to young Jews and stop blaming women. Doesn't it feel like maybe we've been here before?

Update/Post-Script
Apparently, the head of the Reform Movement, Rabbi Eric Yoffie, had some pretty choice comments about how dealing with CUFI & co. (Christians United For Israel) is Bad For The Jews. Although I said some unpleasant things about him when he got a little simpery over Jerry Falwell's death, it seems I spoke too soon: he comes off strongly against co-operation with Christian Zionists and grounds his arguments, here, at least, in the fact that young Jews will (and do--hey there!) find such cooperation repugnant, alienating and traitorous to our own Jewish values. He said:

"[Young Jewish adults] respond negatively to those who disparage other religious traditions and who make exclusivist religious claims. They are insistently centrist in their political views on the Middle East. And they are suspicious of a Jewish establishment that they see as too focused on money and insufficiently focused on values.

And so whom do we offer to these young people as a spokesman for Israel? John Hagee, who is contemptuous of Muslims, dismissive of gays, possesses a triumphalist theology and opposes a two-state solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. If our intention was to distance our young adults from the Jewish state, we could not have made a better choice."


Sounds kinda familiar. So good on you, Rav Yoffie. Where's everybody else?

Friday, May 04, 2007

JewStuff for the Real World

I've sat out the last few weeks because I've been so wrapped up in the (secular) political scene that I thought I would probably just explode if I tried to write anything down.

Let's see how I do.

I've spent the last few weeks generally appalled at my government--a government that refuses to limit gun ownership but will outlaw medical procedures--as well as many of my fellow citizens, including those who were rooting for National Prayer Day. And then when you read that the Prime Minister of Israel has a 3% approval rating because he mangled a military situation and greatly magnified the body count and political damage and you think, why the hell is everyone so down on Israel for lack of political loyalty? I think the lowest recorded approval rating for a sitting American president has been in the low 20s. The low 20s, folks. Please don't hang up the next time John Zogby comes a-ringing, okay?

As happens, I'm now just waiting for the pendulum to swing the other way--the inevitable period of time when the mere sight of the NYTimes will make me queasy. In the interim, that strange middle state where I'm desperate for insight but simply cannot look at DailyKos again, I've taken my usual route, and have been searching out JewStuff that helps me think. JewStuff for the Real World, we might call it.

Thinking about abortion has been weirdly eased by the rereading of two articles--Kathleen Peratis' brilliant piece in the Forward, and a rather old piece in The American Prospect by Sarah Blustain. (I have a curious relationship to her work, as I currently fill a position she once held--and although our interests and stills are very obviously divergent, everything she does has a tinge of what-might-yet-be for me.) I am so impressed with the ability of these women to wrestle honestly with these questions that the abortion issue presents--something that Caitlin Flannagan aims for, and sort of gets, in this month's Atlantic. I think a willingness to grapple with the messy parts of a problem is a really Jewish thing to bring to the table--not in an essentialist way, but simply because the force of history helps it along. All of those rabbis and scholars dissecting point after point of Talmud, following arguments through because to argue is to accrue knowledge and engage in an admirable exercise. It's an argument I've made before, and one I plan to make many times again.

Plus, today's discovery of a very interesting post on Jewcy by David Klinghoffer, whose work I don't really know, provided what I've been looking for for weeks: a Jewish justification for gun-control laws. You should read the post, but the basic concept is that the injunction not to "put a stumbling block before the blind" is essentially a condemnation of providing people with that for which they have a weakness. And he inspired me to make the connections between Jewish law and democratic law that I've been groping for.

I don't believe religious law should have any teeth in civil government--if you haven't caught on that far, you haven't been paying attention. I am an absolutist regarding the separation of Church and State, and I believe that the democracy embodied in the Constitution is a result of the Enlightenment, not religious establishments. That said, I obviously find a lot of beautiful things about Judaism, and I'm most impressed by its ability to train into us the same basic impulses towards good that secualr government at its best seeks to enstatue. Leave grain at the corner of your fields for the poor to collect? It's not an injunction towards charity--it's the recognition that there needs to be a dignified safety net for people. Even kashrut, as I learned at BJ's recently, is much more (in my opinion) about metaphor. It's a way of dealing with the omnivore's dilemma--aka free will. We need to train ourselves not to do hurtful things. And in these pre-Messianic, post-Sanhedrin days, we need a civil government that's going to kick the shit out of us when we screw other people over. (Although the current system--wherein the Rockerfeller Laws trump Enron, doesn't quite fit the ideal.)

I don't know--it's all still a mess in my mind. But I do take a lot of comfort in the fact that my Jewish Judaism helps keep my internal compass on the right path.

Kol tov.